Drilling, spilling, and tilling: Will Obama act on the BP oil catastrophe with rhyme and reason?

It’s said that history doesn’t repeat itself, but sometimes it rhymes. Shortly after the BP Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico, biofuel supporters were chanting “Till, Baby, Till!” in a parody of offshore drilling supporters’ cries of “Drill, Baby, Drill!” at Sarah Palin rallies last year. In the same spirit, political commentators have sought the right rhyme for the giant oil spill itself among prior comparable catastrophes. The disaster was initially called “Obama’s Katrina” by the President’s political enemies, comparing his inaction to President Bush’s widely criticized slow response to Hurricane Katrina. When the scale of the disaster became known, BP’s chairman made a comparison to “Three-Mile Island,” implying that this disaster could put a stop to petroleum as the 1970s disaster effectively froze the U.S. nuclear industry. And now, as the spill has become the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history, even the president’s supporters are comparing it to 9/11 – with “The World is Flat” author Tom Friedman and others making the case that Obama is squandering a historic opportunity to unite the country and possibly the world behind renewable energy.

Given that biofuels are the most direct substitute for the petroleum that’s central to the current crisis, they are likely to receive the most attention from politicians and citizens alike. Moreover, they’re a natural fit for the climate and the economy of the southern U.S. states directly affected by the spill: if Mendel’s 1,200 gal/acre yield claims hold true, Alabama farmers could replace their 360,000 acres of cotton (worth about $250 million at 850 lbs/acre yields and a price of $0.78/lb) with miscanthus, and convert it using technology being developed in neighboring states, like BlueFire’s* cellulosic ethanol biorefinery in Mississippi or DuPont Danisco’s 250,000 gal/yr cellulosic ethanol plant in Tennessee to produce 432 million gallons of ethanol (worth nearly $1 billion at today’s spot price of $1.98). Gulf-state algae companies like PetroAlgae* and PetroSun could get a political and economic boost with their potential to provide biocrude and biodiesel. The risk, however, is that many sketchy biofuel startups will reap millions of taxpayer and investor dollars as they use the oil spill catastrophe to opportunistically promote technologies that have no chance of ever working.

What’s the best path forward for the U.S. government? Despite his acknowledged missteps, Bush’s response to 9/11 provides useful analogies and ideas. At the bottom line, there’s the scope: the total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is $2.4 trillion according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which would amount to a pretty large check for cleaner energy. Where neither Bush nor his then-rival Kerry opted to tax gasoline to fund the war and invest in alternative fuels when gas prices cost half what they do today, Obama should seize the moment and push to tax carbon. A carbon tax would encompass not just oil but also the coal industry, which the recent mining catastrophe shows is also ripe for action. As Bush united 22 federal agencies ranging from Defense to Transportation to Treasury under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Obama should create a Department of Energy and Environment Security that unites overlapping and conflicting activities at the U.S. Departments of Energy, Transportation, and Agriculture, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency. The envisioned agency would also expand the Coast Guard, and totally overhaul the corrupt and ineffective Minerals Management Service – effectively absorbing it, as the DHS absorbed the Immigration and Naturalization Service. And as Bush invested in developing and deploying new airport security technology like terahertz scanners, the country needs investment in developing and deploying new technology like biorefineries, bioremediation, and other alternative fuels (such as coal-bed methane) in development by startups like Luca, Taxon, Ciris, Profero, and in an ironic rhyme, by Synthetic Genomics in collaboration with BP.

* Client registration required.

To read more insights from Lux Research analysts visit Lux Populi.

BP oil spill continues to provide opportunities for new technology applications

It has been over two months since British Petroleum’s (BP) Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig exploded, creating a massive oil spill along the Gulf coast. Earlier, we discussed BP’s use of Corexit, a chemical that breaks down the oil slick for bacterial consumption, or sinks it into the water to prevent it from reaching the shore. In that discussion, we noted Corexit’s potential health risks to humans, as well as marine life and water fowl.

Critics of how the massive oil slick has been handled so far have noted the technologies deployed to counter it are the same technologies used for the last several decades. Though many new technologies offer alternatives, many hurdles remain before a complete solution is found.

Part of the slowdown in adopting new technologies for this spill is that the process for vetting them requires analysis and approval from BP, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as well as other U.S. agencies. With the U.S. government taking charge it is unclear whether we can expect further “red tape” delays. The one silver lining is that all parties involved are entertaining the flood of new ideas and suggestions coming into the help lines – even those in the early stages of field testing – which could provide a potential market for a myriad of new technologies.

In the last several weeks many new technologies, especially companies with non-chemical water treatment technologies, have tried their hand at solving the problem. For example, Ecosphere Technologies has already gained approval from BP and is awaiting approvals from government agencies to deploy its Ozonix Systems, which uses an advanced oxidation process for water treatment. In an interesting convergence, actor Kevin Costner – star of the post-apocalyptic movie Waterworld – has privately funded the development of a centrifugal device with Ocean Therapy Solutions, which BP has approved for testing on the oil spill. The technology separates oil from water, stores it in tankers and returns purified water back to the gulf. John Houghtaling, chief executive of Ocean Therapy Solutions, claims that the largest of his company’s machines can separate oil from water at a rate of 200 gallons per minute.

Meanwhile, other companies fielding clean-up technologies – like MyCelx, AbTech Industries, and Gradek Energy – have since moved away from treating oil spills because of the approvals barriers. However, the Deepwater Horizon spill is also providing opportunities for software solutions and sensor technologies that help guide clean-up efforts. Software technologies that track the movement oil spills have an easier path into this market because they provide ongoing monitoring capability with lower capital costs, and we expect minimal regulatory hurdles given the nature of the services.

Google quietly expanding into energy

Over the past year, Google has expanded its influence in the electricity sector through an accelerating number of new business ventures, lobbying actions, and product announcements. Between 2008 and last year, Google tripled the number of energy issues it lobbied the U.S. Congress about, putting its energy appeals on par with its telecommunications lobbying. Google also released the PowerMeter last year, a free home electricity monitoring, web-based tool that displays information from a smart meter on a consumer portal. It has partnered with a number of utilities to offer this data to their customers.
 
This year, the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved Google’s application to become an electricity marketer, which allows the company to buy and sell wholesale electricity like a utility in order to feed its power-hungry datacenters. The move follows the same strategy of other major power users, like grocer Safeway or consumer products maker Kimberly-Clark. But it also gives Google the option to sell or trade power down the road, and recent moves by the Internet behemoth suggest it plans to do just that.
 
But the company isn’t limiting its sights on energy opportunities in the smart grid. Google’s “green energy czar,” Bill Weihl, announced this month that the firm has developed a prototype mirror for solar thermal, concentrating solar power (CSP). Google has already invested $10 million in solar thermal plant developers BrightSource and eSolar. Now it may be moving to supply them – either directly or through licensing – with cheaper mirrors.

That said, claims that Google’s prototype mirrors reduce system cost by half are unquestionably overhyped. For one, mirror costs account for 5% to 15% of a heliostat thermal plant. Plus, Google’s technology is at least three years away from commercialization. So, it’s unlikely the company has outpaced more experienced mirror and glass manufacturers that are quietly pursuing similar technologies. Even so, if its mirror technology proves viable, expect Google to license it out – perhaps under terms that it can receives discounted access to the electricity generated.
 
Google’s collective moves invite further consideration about its energy plans. For now, it’s likely that the company’s primary interest will be leveraging data and computing power for energy trading. Expediting the addition of low-cost renewables to the mix only improves the viability of that market.

Novomer and DSM take the lead on carbon dioxide-based polymers

Fresh off its impressive $14 million Series B round in 2009, advanced materials start-up Novomer picked up further momentum after it announced a development agreement with investor DSM, a materials science company based in the Netherlands. Novomer’s catalyst technology enables production of plastics, polymers and other fine chemicals from renewable feedstocks like CO and CO2. As we’ve stated before (see the April 6, 2009 LRNJ and the August 31, 2009 LRNJ – client registration required), the company is a leader in a relatively unpopulated field: Other than U.S.-based Empower Materials (see the March 16, 2009 LRNJ – client registration required), Norway-based Norner Innovation (see the March 30, 2009 LRNJ – client registration required), and a few players in Asia, there are very few developers of carbon-dioxide-based polymers outside of university labs.

Novomer and its new partner, DSM, plan to focus on creating carbon-dioxide-based polymer coatings and inks for food and beverage, automotive, and industrial applications. The match between Novomer and DSM makes perfect sense, as their technologies and needs complement one another. Namely, Novomer’s carbon-based polymer production technology dovetails neatly with DSM’s deep experience in developing and selling petroleum-based versions of the polymers. This new agreement and its amenable licensing business model make it safe to predict that Novomer is starting to pull away from its competitors. Clients with needs for environmentally friendly polymers should engage.

Welcome to the Lux Research Analyst Blog

We’re proud to announce the launch of Lux Populi, the Lux Research Analyst Blog. At Lux Research, our 40-person team – with backgrounds ranging from Ph.D. scientists to market researchers – travels the world and conducts thousands of interviews every year to keep up on the latest on emerging technologies in the physical sciences, and advises our clients about the business impact of these technologies. Now, we’ve launched this blog to share some our researchers’ insights and analysis with the world. You’ll see tidbits from our network, news from analyst travels, and findings from our reports, across all our technology verticals – Nanomaterials, Solar, Alternative Power and Energy Storage, Water, and Biosciences – as well as in other fields like printed electronics, green buildings, and renewable energy. Below you’ll find some inaugural posts on the impact that the economic stimulus bill currently working its way through the U.S. Congress is likely to have on some of these fields. Enjoy, and don’t hesitate to reach out to us if you have questions or suggestions.