Targeted delivery of actives: advanced materials on the Lux Innovation Grid

Graphic of the WeekThe targeted delivery technology value chain spans materials, delivery platforms, and end-user applications. This week’s graphic charts the field of competitors developing advanced materials for targeted delivery and controlled release of active ingredients. Solutions range from the highly experimental – such as harvested red blood cells or micro-injectors from sea anemones – to alternative materials, such as cyclodextrins, silicone, or non-encapsulating polymer-based solutions. Clearly, some players are more mature and technologically ready than others.

Among the companies occupying the Grid’s dominant quadrant is Monosol Rx, which is developing novel, dissolvable thin films for targeted delivery in drugs and consumer products, like Listerine Breath Strips. It owes its position on the Grid to a well-qualified management team, steady growth in product development (e.g. seven approved products on the market) and partnerships (e.g. signed agreements with 10 to 15 different firms, including a large pharmaceutical company). Additionally, it recently gained U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for its oral soluble film, which helped it land a total of $6 million in milestone payments (see the July 27, 2010 LRTJ - client registration required). Other category-leading companies in the quadrant include Fertin and Cafosa (developing controlled-release gums) and Depomed, with its gastric retention pill.

The high-potential quadrant includes NuSil Technology, whose silicone-based platform controls release of actives by adjusting the silicone’s properties. With applications in implants and skin care, the company scores highly on Technical Value because silicone is such a versatile material for delivery applications and devices. It fares less well on Business Execution only because it hasn’t disclosed any major partnerships. That leaves an open door for companies such as 3M, which has 30 years of transdermal formulation expertise and dozens of products in the space. While NuSil is an attractive candidate for partnership, InSite Vision and Dendritech should be approached with greater care even though their promising technologies land them in the same quadrant.

Source: Lux Research report “Targeting Emerging Delivery Technologies across the Value Chain: From Chemicals and Materials Suppliers to End-Products and Applications.

Cypress goes on a wild shopping spree, but Marina and Alexza still benefit

People go shopping for various reasons, but Cypress Bioscience’s shopping spree may be the retail therapy it needed from a recent string of bad romances. Cypress Bioscience, a San Diego-based company developing therapeutics targeted towards central nervous system (CNS) disorders, recently acquired technologies from Marina Biotech and Alexza Pharmaceutical (see the February 9, 2010 LRTJ – client registration required). Cypress paid an upfront fee of $750,000 and a potential $27 million milestone for Marina’s patent rights and technology related to Carbetocin, a naturally produced hormone for treatment of autism. In another deal, Cypress paid $5 million upfront and a potential $1 million milestone plus 10% royalty to license Alexza’s smoking cessation Staccato technology that delivers nicotine via inhalation.

Cypress wasn’t the only company to benefit from the deals. The recent acquisition of Novosom’s siRNA delivery (see the August 24, 2010 LRTJ)* makes Marina more “focused on building value around RNAi drug discovery platforms” by selling Carbetocin, said President and CEO Michael French. This will undoubtedly strengthen the company’s competitive position among RNAi therapeutic companies such as Acuity (acquired by OPKO Health), Alnylam, and Calando (see the [October 6, 2009 LRTJ)*.

In addition, Alexza benefits from partners working on alternate applications for its core Staccato technologies since it “has more Staccato-based product candidates than we can currently afford to develop on our own”, said President and CEO Thomas King. All that said, clients should closely monitor the progress of all three companies as the opportunity to focus on their respective technology platforms may advance them ahead of their competitors.

Ranking advanced material delivery developers on the Lux Innovation Grid

Graphic of the WeekFollowing this blog’s recent comparison of companies developing bio/chemical targeted delivery platforms, this week’s graphic looks at a more experimental class of players: those developing advanced material delivery systems.

Advanced material delivery systems are based on novel substances to control placement and function of active ingredients. They rely on innovative approaches ranging from solid polymer shapes, alternative materials like cyclodextrins, and even blood cells harvested from the patient and loaded with drug. As a class, companies in this category are noticeably less mature than other targeted delivery companies, and they have yet to prove the value of their technology and their ability to execute.

The clear leaders are Monosol Rx and Capsulution Pharma. The former’s thin-film formulations of prescription and over-the-counter actives have led to steady growth in product development, partnerships, and sales revenue of around $10 million. Monosol also scores highly on technical value due to its product’s patient-friendly form factor and low cost compared pills or injections. Capsulution Pharma scores high technical marks for the bioavailability and loading of its solid polymer nanoparticles and polyelectrolyte-based drug delivery systems in targeting grave indications like glioblastoma. A strong management team drawn from corporations like Merck as well as start-ups helps boost Capsulation’s score on the business execution dimension.

Soy Works’ comparatively high technical score derives from the versatility and apparent effectiveness of the biodegradable plastic resins it’s developing based on soy protein. Representative applications include nutrient-releasing pots for houseplants and drug-loaded feed granules for animal medicine. The small founder-funded company is growing organically, but without partners or a cash infusion it struggles on business execution.

Source: Lux Research report “Ranking Targeted Delivery Technologies on the Lux Innovation Grid.”