Nano-enabled battery makers on the Lux Innovation Grid

Graphic of the WeekEnvironment and energy, or “cleantech,” applications have become a target for more and more companies developing nanointermediate products, such as batteries for electric vehicles. Developers targeting this segment incorporate nanomaterials like lithium titanate and lithium iron phosphate nanoparticles into battery electrodes.

In a recent report*, Lux Research summarized the opportunities of this space, and applied its proprietary assessment tool, the Lux Innovation Grid, to compare the field of competitors and identify its most likely winners. The Grid scores each company on three attributes – technical value, business execution, and maturity, and then assigns a relative position on the Lux Innovation Grid’s four quadrants.

Overall, the report found little technological differentiation between firms targeting this segment. A123Systems, alone, pulls away from the pack due to its solid business execution. Like many of its competitors, the company develops nanostructured lithium iron phosphate battery electrodes for the automotive market. But A123Systems was the only nanotech company to go public in 2009, and signaled one of the year’s most successful IPOs in any technology category.

Electrovaya, which scored highest in technical value, is developing nanostructured polymer electrolyte technology for three different battery cathode chemistries. A relatively strong revenue-to-employee ratio of $41,538 and a strong partnership list that includes Tata Motors also help distinguish it from the competition.

Alone in the Long Shot quadrant is K2 Energy Solutions that, despite two recent battery-development deals, hasn’t yet landed a large partner in the lucrative automotive sector. The aforementioned deals include a $30 million grant from the Chinese government for a joint venture with DLG battery, and another with an undisclosed customer in personal mobility (e.g. scooter and e-bikes).

Also, Altair Nanotechnologies’ status has changed for the worse since Lux issued its report in March. With a Q1 burn rate five times its 2009 annual revenues and a stock price below $0.40, Altair is in danger of being delisted from NASDAQ by the end of 2010. Although an updated score for Altair is as yet unavailable, its position on the Grid has likely drifted into Long Shot territory.

* Source: Lux Research report “The Governing Green Giants: Makers of Cleantech Nanointermediates on the Lux Innovation Grid” (client registration required)

Battery-makers discuss the European market, U.S. stimulus money and Asian competition

A panel of battery manufacturers at the recent Advanced Battery Value Chain explored opportunities here and abroad, as well as the potential impact of U.S. economic stimulus funding. The panel included representatives from several companies that had recently received stimulus money, including lead-acid battery maker Axion Power, Li-ion battery and electric-vehicle maker Electrovaya, and Li-ion battery and pack developer Compact Power.

In response to a question of what it will take to make electric vehicles happen, Axion’s Edward Buiel replied that he strongly felt legislation is what will make the difference.

Axion’s lead-acid technology targets “start-stop” applications in which batteries merely serve to a hybrid’s acceleration as it begins to roll. Typically aimed at micro-hybrid vehicles, the technology has potential in the European market where new legislation mandates CO2 emissions from vehicles must be under 130 g/km by 2012. Otherwise, car makers face a very stiff penalty of €95/g CO2/km for each vehicle sold that doesn’t meet the standard.

Buiel said that if the U.S. does not institute a similar penalty, all the stimulus money going to battery manufacturing and electric vehicles will be worthless. He added that Axion’s advanced lead-acid batteries can help improve fuel efficiency by up to 30% in higher performance vehicles like BMWs, which currently emit between 150 and 180 g/km of CO2.

Sinking money into building domestic manufacturing capacity alone won’t be enough to overcome the cost hurdles preventing adoption of electric vehicles. Adding carbon prices in the U.S. won’t be enough to move the needle for  next-generation plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and all-electric vehicles (EVs). Imposing the equivalent of $50/ton of CO2 would effectively raise the price per barrel of oil ($/bbl) by only $20.

Based on our research, however, prices need to skyrocket from around $75/bbl today to around $200/bbl before they significantly impact sales of PHEVs and EVs (see Unplugging the Hype around Electric Vehicles: client registration required). Micro-hybrids are another story, and sales of these vehicles may indeed be spurred by a carbon tax.

Stimulus funding and Chinese competition
Needless to say, the topic of U.S.-China competition in battery manufacturing also came up during the discussion. Panel member Sankar Das Gupta, CEO of Electrovaya, argued that Li-ion cells can be cost effectively manufactured in North America through a high degree of automation. The caveat is high production volumes. U.S. stimulus funding can help companies overcome the capital investment hurdle.

Buiel indicated he expects high quality and advanced lead acid batteries will continue to be built in North America for a long time. The reason is because the U.S. traditionally has more advanced production technology and the manufacturing of lead acid batteries requires more highly skilled labor. Consequently, lead-acid players in North America are less threatened by Chinese competitors than their Li-ion counterparts, like Electrovaya.

Firms focusing on lead-acid technology, he added, will likely get a boost from the European market, where micro-hybrids are more popular than PHEVs in the foreseeable future. However, this advantage figures less prominently in the U.S. and Asia, where the focus is squarely on PHEVs and all-electric vehicles powered by Li-ion batteries.