New water treatment technologies seep into oil and gas applications

Graphic of the Week

Innovative new water treatment technologies have long struggled to gain a toehold in markets where age-old, cheap, commodity solutions remain deeply entrenched. The exception is the oil and gas industry, where drilling companies see value in new technologies that can help eliminate the cost and logistics of transporting wastewater offsite for treatment. Several emerging technologies offer small footprints that allow treatment to occur at the wellhead.

This week’s graphic ranks the strongest contenders on the Lux Innovation Grid according to how they score on technical value, business execution, and maturity. Focusing on the Dominant quadrant, Ecosphere, WaterTectonics, and Aquapure all solve the same problem through different technologies.

WaterTectonics – which has an exclusive arrangement with Halliburton – removes heavy metals from produced water using electrocoagulation. Ecosphere, now expanding its footprint as part of an entity called Hydrozonics, uses a combination of ozone, cavitation, and electrochemistry to prevent heavy metal build up rather than removing it. AquaPure eschews subtlety altogether and simply distills fresh water off.

All three solutions minimize chemical use and disinfect the water. The biggest distinction between them is the amount of energy required. Were all things equal, this might make AquaPure the loser. But water treatment is a service business for oil and gas, and energy costs don’t matter if they aren’t passed on to the gas company. Despite the huge energy differences, Aquapure may charge gas companies $9.40 to $25 per cubic meter, which is competitive with WaterTectonics at around $12.50. Ecosphere undercuts them both at $4.70 to $5.66 per.

Other contenders in the Dominant quadrant produce polymers that absorb oil and remove it from water. Gradek Energy targets high-concentration tar-sand wastewater with a reusable product, while MyCelx uses a disposable product for low-concentration wastewater. GE Water distributes MyCelx products, adding significantly to their clout, but clients should keep in mind that this is a crowded and relatively low-tech space.

Source: Lux Research report “Water Chemicals and Competitors: The Long, Long March of the “Chemical-Free” Revolution.”

Which water technology will help unlock offshore oil and gas reserves?

Graphic of the weekAlong with the crude oil and natural gas that fuels modern civilization, the energy industry brings nearly 233 billion barrels of wastewater from beneath the earth’s surface every year. This so-called “produced water” can contain a variety of contaminants – from oil and grease to chemicals, micro-organisms, and radioactive elements. The need to treat this water before disposal or reuse has attracted a multitude of technology developers clambering to tackle the challenge. This week’s graphic ranks 29 companies developing solutions for offshore produced water treatment.

Offshore oil platforms are a wholly different kettle of fish than onshore rigs. Clearly, offshore technologies must fit within strict confines, making large treatment systems simply unfeasible. Plus, disposal options are limited for offshore produced water. Generally it is just discharged into the ocean, and regulation around contaminant levels is strictly enforced. Energy exploration and production companies are required to send monthly discharge samples for testing. Regulation for offshore produced water discharge is mainly focused on dissolved and dispersed hydrocarbon content. This last factor helps explain the favorable position of MyCelx Technologies Corporation and Abtech Industries. Both companies derive their high technical score for developing hydrocarbon absorbing polymer technology, which suits for the size and contaminant considerations of offshore treatment.

Veolia MPPE occupies the Dominant quadrant in several of the report’s figures, including this one. In the case of offshore treatment, the company’s position is due in part to applications in the North Sea, which has the most strict discharge limits of less than 20 ppm of hydrocarbons allowed and a “no damage requirement,” which Veolia’s system is able to address. The challenge with absorbants is that they produce waste (sponge or beads) that also needs to be managed. For this reason, advanced oxidation and coarse filtration are other technologies applied to this market segment.

BP oil spill continues to provide opportunities for new technology applications

It has been over two months since British Petroleum’s (BP) Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig exploded, creating a massive oil spill along the Gulf coast. Earlier, we discussed BP’s use of Corexit, a chemical that breaks down the oil slick for bacterial consumption, or sinks it into the water to prevent it from reaching the shore. In that discussion, we noted Corexit’s potential health risks to humans, as well as marine life and water fowl.

Critics of how the massive oil slick has been handled so far have noted the technologies deployed to counter it are the same technologies used for the last several decades. Though many new technologies offer alternatives, many hurdles remain before a complete solution is found.

Part of the slowdown in adopting new technologies for this spill is that the process for vetting them requires analysis and approval from BP, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as well as other U.S. agencies. With the U.S. government taking charge it is unclear whether we can expect further “red tape” delays. The one silver lining is that all parties involved are entertaining the flood of new ideas and suggestions coming into the help lines – even those in the early stages of field testing – which could provide a potential market for a myriad of new technologies.

In the last several weeks many new technologies, especially companies with non-chemical water treatment technologies, have tried their hand at solving the problem. For example, Ecosphere Technologies has already gained approval from BP and is awaiting approvals from government agencies to deploy its Ozonix Systems, which uses an advanced oxidation process for water treatment. In an interesting convergence, actor Kevin Costner – star of the post-apocalyptic movie Waterworld – has privately funded the development of a centrifugal device with Ocean Therapy Solutions, which BP has approved for testing on the oil spill. The technology separates oil from water, stores it in tankers and returns purified water back to the gulf. John Houghtaling, chief executive of Ocean Therapy Solutions, claims that the largest of his company’s machines can separate oil from water at a rate of 200 gallons per minute.

Meanwhile, other companies fielding clean-up technologies – like MyCelx, AbTech Industries, and Gradek Energy – have since moved away from treating oil spills because of the approvals barriers. However, the Deepwater Horizon spill is also providing opportunities for software solutions and sensor technologies that help guide clean-up efforts. Software technologies that track the movement oil spills have an easier path into this market because they provide ongoing monitoring capability with lower capital costs, and we expect minimal regulatory hurdles given the nature of the services.