Over the past few years, innovation interest in materials informatics has grown exponentially, but materials informatics data challenges require companies to formulate a clear strategy to reap the benefits.
Now is the time to form a materials informatics strategy. To navigate innovation in materials informatics, we have developed three strategies for corporate players to engage in the space, outlined in the new report “How to Form a Materials Informatics Strategy.”
On average, a new material development cycle takes 10 to 20 years. Materials informatics has the potential to shorten the long and costly development cycles for chemicals and materials companies by five to 10 years. Through the application of data science and artificial intelligence methods, materials informatics accelerates chemical and material development. Typical applications include property optimization, design of experiments, and product performance optimization.
Due to materials informatics’ datacentric nature, early adopters will face a steep learning curve, but these players will also gain a first-mover advantage as they overcome challenges.
In our new report, we outline three strategies for chemicals and materials companies to penetrate the space. We also evaluate a company’s potential success by comparing the strategies for varying corporate circumstances. For large companies to successfully reap the benefits of materials informatics, a clear strategy needs to be formed. Although materials informatics provides notable cost savings, it requires large amounts of data to be implemented effectively.
Below are the three strategies we identified:
- Working with a Startup:
- Benefits: This is the quickest way to engage in materials informatics, as startups with sophisticated materials informatics platforms can help utilize data to provide value.
- Challenges: Startups themselves usually can’t contribute much data, and sharing data with a small startup may not be worth it from the data security perspective.
- Starting an Internal Initiative:
- Benefits: The result of this strategy will be custom-fit for your needs, and the issues around data sharing and security are eliminated entirely.
- Challenges: This approach requires a company to have both top-notch talent and decades of accumulated data, and this method presents a steep learning curve, as a company’s internal team will have to be tolerant of working by trial and error.
- Forming a Consortium with Peers:
- Benefits: This strategy allow you to leverage external expertise and data sources to ease development, and this model is likely to accelerate technical advances in the materials informatics landscape.
- Challenges: Complex legal and confidentiality issues around data sharing pose friction to this strategy; it could also pose a risk of lack of differentiation.
A consortium strategy could reset the competitive landscape of the chemical and material industry, as it is the most powerful of the three proposed materials informatics strategies. As materials informatics’ potential becomes clear, efforts by global governments and industry pioneers have begun to boost development in the space.
Our new report offers case studies and the best practices for the three strategies proposed above. Additionally, the report dives deeper into opportunities and challenges for a variety of corporate circumstances. For more information about how to leverage materials informatics for your organization, download our executive summary.
- Report: How to Form a Materials Informatics Strategy (Members Only)
- Executive Summary: Materials Informatics Will Cut Development Time in Half
- Blog: The Best Time to Form a Materials Informatics Strategy is Now
- Tech Page: Materials Informatics (Members Only)
- News Commentary: Researchers combine computation and materials informatics to discover new perovskite for potential use in photovoltaics
- Press Release: Materials Informatics Strategies Will Cut Development Time in Half
- On Demand Webinar: How and Why You Should Form a Materials Informatics Strategy